|
|
  
Probe Ministries
Education: What Works
Don Closson
Introduction
If anything is constant in public education, it is the endless
cycle of reform and innovation that in turn generates endless
theories and educational jargon. Heated conflicts exist over how to
teach everything from reading to algebra. In the past, when our
public schools were mostly local affairs, the debate was more
localized. Today, state legislatures and even Congress take part in
the battles, which can occasionally become the single most
important issue in statewide elections.
Parents are usually not interested in the politics of education;
they want to know what works! They realize that their children have
one opportunity to become an educated person and those
inappropriate educational ends or methods will permanently shape
their children's lives. Here we will focus on answers to the
question, "What works in education?" Some of the answers will come
from a compilation of research done by the Department of Education
under William Bennett in the 1980's.
Education should be about two tasks, building the intellect and
instilling virtue. Regarding the intellect, the following words of
Jacques Barzun serve us well:
[I]t is intelligence stored up and made into habits of discipline,
signs and symbols of meaning, chains of reasoning and spurs to
emotions--a shorthand (and a wireless) by which the mind can skip
connectives, recognize ability, and communicate truth. Intellect is
at once a body of common knowledge and the channels through which
the right particle of it can be brought to bear quickly, without
the effort of redemonstration, on the matter in hand.{1}
Many have recognized the fact that parents are the first and most
important teachers of their children. Christian parents should seek
to begin their children's education as early as possible. To that
end, John Amos Comenius wrote in his work The Great Didactic
that,
If we want to educate a person in virtue we must polish him at a
tender age. And if someone is to advance toward wisdom he must be
opened up for it in the first years of his life when his
industriousness is still burning, his mind is malleable, and his
memory still strong.{2}
What can parents do? To begin with, the more book-friendly parents
can make a home the better. Parents should read to their young
children and let their children read to them. Asking in-depth
questions about what is being read will boost comprehension skills,
vocabulary, and general knowledge. Keep a consistent family routine
for meals, bedtime and homework. Both parents should model the
importance of a life of the mind. One of the best ways of doing
this is to limit mindless entertainment like television. For, in
order for our children to become mature
handlers of the Word (2 Timothy 2:15), they must become competent
readers.
Next we will look at the way parents and teachers can partner
together to educate our children.
The Parent Teacher Partnership
It is extremely important that both teacher and parents convey high
expectations to students regarding academic performance.
Studies have shown that low expectations on the part of teachers
can become self-fulfilling prophecies for their students. These
students are often seated far from the teacher, receiving less
direct instruction and attention. Parents need to work with
teachers who have failed to expect good work from their children.
This requires frequent communication with the teacher, as well as
the student. If a parent perceives that a teacher may have "given
up" on their child, a meeting with everyone involved, including a
school counselor, should be called immediately. If the situation is
allowed to continue, your child may find himself hopelessly
behind.
Sometimes parents demand too much of their children, resulting in
anxiety and low self-confidence, but it is far more common for
parents not to expect reasonably high standards for their
children's academic work.
A corollary to setting high expectations for students is helping
them to make a healthy connection between ability and effort. When
students are young they equate effort with ability. In other words,
if they work hard and do well, they assume that they have a high
level of ability. Failure means that they did not try hard enough,
something that they can personally overcome on the next assignment.
Later, students learn that ability and effort are not the same.
Some students need to work much harder at certain things in order
to do as well as others. As a result, students might try to mask
what they perceive to be low ability by turning in tests early even
though they are hastily finished or by choosing not to participate
in class discussions. High levels of effort come to represent low
ability. As a result many students fail to work to their potential.
Believing that they lack ability, they eventually lose hope for
academic success.
Underachievement becomes a response to the possibility that they
may be low ability students. Teachers and parents must intervene
before these patterns become fixed. By setting high standards and
insisting on consistent, diligent work, parents and teachers can
work together to build confidence that can become the foundation
for future effort. In some cases, parents may need to help their
children crawl before they can walk. They may have to supervise
homework efforts minute by minute until the student begins to see
a connection between the work invested and its resulting
success.
Some general rules for successful study include: convince your
child not to cram or try to accomplish large amounts of work in one
sitting, help them to weigh the importance of an assignment by
developing a system of schoolwork triage, and help your student to
identify the standards necessary to succeed. Parents and students
should work together to find a strategy that yields the best
results.
Classroom Environment
The amount of class time spent on instruction has an obvious
influence on student achievement. Unfortunately, studies show that
in elementary classrooms actual "time on task," time focused on
academic subjects, ranges from 50 percent to 90 percent of a given
school day. This is so proportioned because of tasks imposed on the
classroom teacher by those outside of the schools. But it can also
be an indication of poor classroom management. What does a well-managed
classroom look like?
First, class work is carefully planned, including content,
presentation time, and instructional activities. Good teachers set
and communicate clear expectations to the students so that they
know what is required to succeed. They also make sure that content
is sequenced so that it builds in a logical and consistent fashion
and that students know where they are heading and how to get
there.{3} A good teacher will also check students for comprehension
often and give them multiple opportunities to practice what they
have learned. This common sense approach to classroom management is
called direct instruction, and research indicates that it has been
found to help young and disadvantaged students learn basic skills
and older, higher ability students to tackle more complex
material.{4}
Since the more time that is focused on a topic naturally results in
greater learning, the way that a teacher utilizes homework is also
important. Research shows that although homework is beneficial for
all students, it is even more significant for those with low and
medium abilities. In fact, average students who do three to five
hours of homework a week, begin to receive grades equal to those of
high-ability students who do no homework at all.{5} It has been
found that Japanese students spend about twice as much time
studying outside of school as American students.{6}
However, not every type of homework is helpful. All of us can
remember doing homework that seemed like an afterthought. Homework
needs to be well planned to be effective. It should relate directly
to what is happening in the classroom and be treated as an integral
part of instruction by the teacher. This means that teachers should
take time to evaluate the assignments and count the grade.
Assignments should be analytical rather than standard work sheets,
and they should encourage students to think more deeply about the
material. Homework encourages students to follow directions, to
make comparisons, to raise questions, and to develop responsibility
and self-discipline.{7}
Student assessment is another key factor to effective schooling.
Teachers should evaluate students often in order to detect if the
material is being covered too quickly or too slowly. Assessment
should be done often and by various means. Teachers should use
essays, tests, homework, quizzes (both verbal and written), as well
as group projects to measure student progress. Students benefit
from immediate feedback so that they can correct ineffective study
habits or arrange for special tutoring
Teaching Methods
You wouldn't think that how we teach children to read would be very
controversial. It is! The ongoing battle between whole-language
advocates and those who recommend systematic, structured phonics
instruction is a heated and often strident one. The two methods
stand on very different theoretical foundations and thus emphasize
different activities for children. Both use phonics and both
advocate early, intensive reading by children. But whole-language
promoters argue that learning to read and write are natural skills
that can be acquired as easily as learning to talk. Just immerse
children in words and good books, and they will eventually make
sense of it all. Phonics advocates argue that reading is not a
natural skill, and that children need intensive and comprehensive
phonics training to succeed. They add that a high level of
illiteracy, even in the U.S. where the written word is universally
found, refutes the notion that language skill acquisition is
automatic.
Jeanne Chall, long time professor at the Harvard Graduate School of
Education argued that research has established that reading is
essentially a phonemic activity; children must know the
relationship between sounds and letters. If children have not
mastered this basic information, they cannot learn to read.
Research has also demonstrated that teaching phonics benefits all
children, particularly those who are at risk. Focusing on phonics
does not deaden a child's desire to read, in fact, whole language
is hurting children by not providing them with the tools necessary
to read.{8} Athough whole language advocates argue that invented
spelling, which calls upon students to apply phonics knowledge,
actually forces students to think more deeply about phonics, others
are not convinced of its effectiveness.
Our question is, "What really works?" Research by Steven A. Stahl
and Patricia Miller concluded, "We have no evidence showing that
whole language programs produce effects that are stronger than
existing basal programs, and potentially may produce lower
effects."{9} Even stalwarts of whole language are moving towards a
more comprehensive phonics curriculum.
Similar arguments have arisen over the use of calculators in early
math instruction. Although many math teachers advocate early
classroom use, the public is not so sure. One survey found that 80
percent of math teachers are in favor of early use, but only 10
percent of the public agrees. Although the final word on early
calculator use is still out, research does support the use of
manipulatives in teaching young children math. Using objects to
represent mathematical values helps students to understand abstract
ideas quicker.
Likewise, students learn science best when they are able to do
experiments on personal predictions regarding natural phenomenon.
Students often reject textbook and lecture material for what they
consider to be common sense. Only when they are confronted with
actual experimental data do they shed themselves of incorrect
assumptions.
Finally let's look at how overall school organization affects
learning.
School Organization
Schools benefit greatly from having a strong educational leader,
usually the principal, who focuses continually on improving the
educational program of the school. This doesn't seem too
controversial. Unfortunately, many principals are either not
equipped to perform this role or are not expected to. In order to
be an educational leader, a principal must have thought carefully
and deeply about what it means to be an educated person, and to
have developed a clear vision for implementing his or her plan.
Some principals haven't had the academic experience to prepare them
for this role. Too many have come from a physical education
background and coaching duties, which may be a plus when it comes
to discipline problems, but not very helpful in constructing an
overall vision for academic excellence.
The educational leader should also enjoy a high degree of autonomy
in building his or her program. This includes the hiring and firing
of teachers and unrestricted communication with parents. Success is
often determined by how well parents and teachers can be motivated
towards the principal's vision. Unfortunately, this is much easier
to do in private schools than in public ones.
A safe and orderly school environment is necessary for learning to
occur. Nevertheless, many schools do not enjoy this basic
requirement for success. This problem not only impacts inner city
schools, which fight the multiple problems related to poverty and
highly bureaucratic administrations. Rural schools can suffer from
poor discipline and a lack of consistent policies as well.
Realistically, even in generally good schools, a single teacher can
diminish the educational experience of his or her class by refusing
to, or not even desiring to, maintain order. This is where a strong
principal can step in and make a difference.
A teaching staff is most effective when they share high morale,
agree that students need grounding in the basics of each subject,
and hold students to high standards. Teacher collegiality, the
sharing of problems and solutions with one another in a
professional atmosphere, is another indication of an effective
teaching staff. Unfortunately, many teachers operate without the
benefit of peer input. Collegiality seems to occur more often at
the elementary school level than in our high schools.
Schools that test their students for the purpose of offering
remedial help tend to be more effective, as are those that
encourage their students to take more advanced academic courses.
Just knowing what an effective school looks like is only part of
the battle for better schools. The challenge is to change poorly
performing schools into effective ones. Research shows that
effective schools tend to have a much higher degree of autonomy
than ineffective ones; something found far more often in private
schools than in public schools. Unfortunately, our public school
bureaucracy doesn't appear to be moving in the right direction.
Notes
- Jacques Barzun, The House of Intellect, (Harper & Row: New York, 1959), 4.
- What Works: Research About Teaching and Learning, U.S. Department of Education, 1986, 6.
- Ibid., 34.
- Ibid., 35.
- Ibid., 41.
- Ibid.
- Ibid., 42.
- "Whole Language in the 90's," Update, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Vol 35 #9, 1993.
- Arthur Ellis & Jeffrey Fouts, Research on Educational Innovations, Princeton, NJ: Eye On Education, 46.
© 2001 Probe Ministries
About the Author
Don Closson received the B.S. in education from Southern Illinois
University, the M.S. in educational administration from Illinois State
University, and the M.A. in Biblical Studies from Dallas Theological Seminary.
He served as a public school teacher and administrator before
joining Probe Ministries as a research associate in the field of education. He is the
general editor of Kids, Classrooms, and Contemporary Education.
He can be reached via e-mail at dclosson@probe.org.
What is Probe?
Probe Ministries is a non-profit corporation whose mission is to reclaim the
primacy of Christian thought and values in Western culture through media,
education, and literature. In seeking to accomplish this mission, Probe provides
perspective on the integration of the academic disciplines and historic
Christianity.
In addition, Probe acts as a clearing house, communicating the results of
its research to the church and society at large.
Further information about Probe's materials and ministry may be obtained by
writing to:
Probe Ministries
1900 Firman Drive, Suite 100
Richardson, TX 75081
(972) 480-0240 FAX (972) 644-9664
info@probe.org
www.probe.org
Copyright (C) 1996-2008 Probe Ministries
Email this to a friend
copyright
© 1995-2008
Leadership U. All rights reserved.
Updated: 14 July 2002
|